Some of the reconstructions r rather abrupt which most things n photos r not, so it takes a lot more work 2 get them 2 look 'natural' & not 'fixed'.Īnother improvement would b 2 have a circle in use on the actual photo depicting the size of the brush selected. The reconstruction is better in some circumstances & not so much n others, so I would guess that part cancels each other out.ġ thing I think would help is a 'feather' feature much like the brush size on this newest version. The version offered 2day makes the selection process more precise, although it takes a little practice 2 get a steady hand. I have used both versions mentioned a lot here. images along with a selection tool in future versions. Once again it is reiterated that the application should be able to work with tiff. This means clean removal of objects without evidence is possible in such photos and not others. The puppy was in the green field and even careless brushing, i.e., inclusion of areas outside the puppy would not matter as it is a flat background and pixel substitution will not show. This is needed for selecting objects against complex backgrounds for removal. Any red brushing would be confined to within the selection area and would not spread over. Lasso tools for selection of the area to be removed would be a great improvement. ![]() ![]() The developers could find out means of making this programme compatible with tiff. In this programme the entire operation of removing objects has to be done at one go and saved to reduce quality loss. One important point to note is degradation of quality of jpeg images everytime it is opened, edited and saved again.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |